chromodynamics: (Default)
[personal profile] chromodynamics
On the Democratic side:
Hillary wins Nevada, with 51% to Obama's 45% and Edwards's 4%.

More pundits are discussing Edwards roles as a possible kingmaker. However, after the showing in Nevada, where he had hoped to do well because of union support, and his low numbers in South Carolina (he is in the mid-teens), I'm starting to wonder if Edwards will be able to find enough funding to continue through to the end.

On the Republican side:
McCain wins South Carolina, with 33% to Huck's 30%, Thompson's 16% and Romney's 15%.

Romney wins Nevada, with 51% to Paul's 14% (!), McCain's 13%, Huck's 8%.

And the chaos continues.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-20 04:04 am (UTC)
misscake: (Default)
From: [personal profile] misscake
I'm starting to wonder if Edwards will be able to find enough funding to continue through to the end.

:\

But even if he doesn't, he'll still be able to influence where his already committed delegates end up. Or negotiate for a running mate postion.

And yeah, what's with the 14% for Paul in Nevada? Is it because he was the only one other than Romney to campaign there?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-21 11:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chromodynamics.livejournal.com
Yes, he will, though really to this point he doesn't have many delegates (none of them do), only 52. He may have more if he makes it through Feb. 5th, if he can make it that long.

As above, C pointed out that he has stronger support among libertarians, who are themselves more prevalent out West.

Dig the icon!

Profile

chromodynamics: (Default)
chromodynamics

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     1 2
345 6789
10111213141516
171819 20212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags