2008 Presidential Race
Jan. 19th, 2008 10:14 pmOn the Democratic side:
Hillary wins Nevada, with 51% to Obama's 45% and Edwards's 4%.
More pundits are discussing Edwards roles as a possible kingmaker. However, after the showing in Nevada, where he had hoped to do well because of union support, and his low numbers in South Carolina (he is in the mid-teens), I'm starting to wonder if Edwards will be able to find enough funding to continue through to the end.
On the Republican side:
McCain wins South Carolina, with 33% to Huck's 30%, Thompson's 16% and Romney's 15%.
Romney wins Nevada, with 51% to Paul's 14% (!), McCain's 13%, Huck's 8%.
And the chaos continues.
Hillary wins Nevada, with 51% to Obama's 45% and Edwards's 4%.
More pundits are discussing Edwards roles as a possible kingmaker. However, after the showing in Nevada, where he had hoped to do well because of union support, and his low numbers in South Carolina (he is in the mid-teens), I'm starting to wonder if Edwards will be able to find enough funding to continue through to the end.
On the Republican side:
McCain wins South Carolina, with 33% to Huck's 30%, Thompson's 16% and Romney's 15%.
Romney wins Nevada, with 51% to Paul's 14% (!), McCain's 13%, Huck's 8%.
And the chaos continues.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-20 03:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-21 11:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-20 04:04 am (UTC):\
But even if he doesn't, he'll still be able to influence where his already committed delegates end up. Or negotiate for a running mate postion.
And yeah, what's with the 14% for Paul in Nevada? Is it because he was the only one other than Romney to campaign there?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-21 11:56 am (UTC)As above, C pointed out that he has stronger support among libertarians, who are themselves more prevalent out West.
Dig the icon!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-21 08:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-21 11:58 am (UTC)