chromodynamics: (Bush and Baby)
[personal profile] chromodynamics
Two very interesting articles today on Politico on Obama's veepstakes, specifically on whether Clinton should or should not be his pick.

Why the Obama-Clinton ticket is nuts
...And why it isn't nuts

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-13 01:03 am (UTC)
misscake: (Default)
From: [personal profile] misscake
I think I'm leaning towards the "...is nuts" side. For a while, I thought it could work, but the first article brings up some very good points.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-13 10:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chromodynamics.livejournal.com
That is why I thought it was interesting; both articles have excellent points, and I agree with everyone that is mentioned, both the five for and the five against. It will be very interesting to see which way Obama goes, and how Clinton will behave (whether she will actively pursue the vice-presidency, remove herself from the running, or do neither).

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-13 10:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chromodynamics.livejournal.com
Also, I just realized I had linked to the second page of the "isn't nuts" article. I fixed it, in case you didn't see all 5 reasons.

Profile

chromodynamics: (Default)
chromodynamics

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     1 2
345 6789
10111213141516
171819 20212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags