The Feynman Chronicles
Apr. 26th, 2006 11:27 amSo I read this title of this article thinking, being a physicist, "How are they going to make the Feynman lectures, which while very important to physics and expecially quantum mechanics are still someone lecturing at a blackboard, into a movie?"
Then I read the article.
"Disney Opens The Feynman Chronicles
Because Indiana Jones has been away from our screens for so long, it’s only natural that young upstarts would try and take his place.
The latest in a long line of adventurers who think they’ve got what it takes the carry the bullwhip is Richard Feynman, a brilliant young physicist recruited by the US government to track down a mysterious object that falls from the sky and crashes into a remote mountain in 1940s Africa. He gets a little help from a sexy British lady spy and a cranky French pilot. But he’ll have to be swift – those dashed Nazis are after the object too…
That’s the concept for The Feynman Chronicles, a spec script by Ashley E Miller and Zack Stentz. The writing duo previously penned Agent Cody Banks 2 and worked on TV sci fi show Andromeda, which is not something anyone should really shout about. Still, Disney has snapped up their scribblings and will soon start looking for a director and cast."
Ooooooookay...
Then I read the article.
"Disney Opens The Feynman Chronicles
Because Indiana Jones has been away from our screens for so long, it’s only natural that young upstarts would try and take his place.
The latest in a long line of adventurers who think they’ve got what it takes the carry the bullwhip is Richard Feynman, a brilliant young physicist recruited by the US government to track down a mysterious object that falls from the sky and crashes into a remote mountain in 1940s Africa. He gets a little help from a sexy British lady spy and a cranky French pilot. But he’ll have to be swift – those dashed Nazis are after the object too…
That’s the concept for The Feynman Chronicles, a spec script by Ashley E Miller and Zack Stentz. The writing duo previously penned Agent Cody Banks 2 and worked on TV sci fi show Andromeda, which is not something anyone should really shout about. Still, Disney has snapped up their scribblings and will soon start looking for a director and cast."
Ooooooookay...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-26 03:53 pm (UTC)My god. It's. I can't stop cracking up at this but I feel it's only appropriate given his legacy and sense of humor that Richard Feynman would become the next Indiana Jones.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-26 03:54 pm (UTC)Is this a late April Fool or something?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-26 04:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-26 04:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-26 04:06 pm (UTC)...
...
OK, so you KNOW how much trouble I had with Feynman as an undergrad, how I kind of blamed him for the "aw, shucks, boys will be boys" sexism in phyics. There is a part of me that thinks this is his comeuppance and a part of me that wants to throw things across the room that he's still a boy hero.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-26 04:10 pm (UTC):-*
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-26 04:21 pm (UTC)I mean, at least from the brief summary above, because other than both being physicists, it sounds like the movie will have nothing to do with his real life in any way.
And thanks for the album! :)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-26 06:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-26 07:02 pm (UTC)This new movie seems to me to be more along the lines of Shakespeare in Love. But the writer in that film was clearly providing a fictional account of how some of the real events of Shakespeare's life came about, specifically his plays.
What I find both hilarious and disturbing about the Feynman movie is that the writers appear to be taking a real person and instead of providing possible explanations or fictional accounts that lead up to some of the real events in that person's life, they throw that out the window and come up with a completely different script to their life.
Also, it's just weird to me that they said, "Let's take this somewhat mischevious college professor and make him an action-adventure hero!" It would be the same if someone came up with a gripping medical drama about Lewis and Clark, or a horror film about the haunting of Shirley Temple, or a western whose protaganist was Lenin (hence my other post). I suppose someone could come up with fictional stories like this, but why use real people for something so clearly outside their historical reference?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-28 12:07 am (UTC)